Earth movement is an exclusion in every standard home, condo, renters and landlord policy: earthquake, landslide, subsidence, sinkhole, and the settling and cracking that follows. Fire that starts because a quake ruptures a gas line is usually still paid by the home policy, because fire is the peril, but the shaking damage itself, the cracked foundation, the collapsed chimney, the contents thrown from shelves, is not. Earthquake coverage fills that gap, either as an endorsement to the home policy or as a standalone policy from a specialty carrier.
Of the four states we serve, Utah has the clearest exposure. The Wasatch Front, from Brigham City through Salt Lake City to Provo, sits along a fault system that geologists expect to produce a large quake, and the valley floor is soft lakebed sediment that amplifies shaking and can liquefy. Nevada is among the more seismically active states, with faulting around Reno, Carson City and the western valleys; Idaho's mountains produced the Borah Peak and Stanley quakes; and Arizona has a lower but real exposure around Flagstaff and Yuma. Much of the older housing along the Wasatch Front is unreinforced brick, which is the construction that fails first.
The premium is set from the address and its soil, the construction type and age, the number of storeys, whether the home is bolted to its foundation and its water heater is strapped, the presence of a masonry chimney or brick veneer, the dwelling and contents limits, and the deductible chosen. Wood-frame homes on firm ground cost the least to insure and take the least damage; brick homes on the valley floor are the opposite on both counts.
The analysis prices an endorsement against the standalone options for the address, shows what each deductible would mean in dollars for your dwelling limit, and tells you whether the coverage is worth carrying. For a newer wood-frame home with a paid-off mortgage and reserves, the answer is sometimes no.